Challenging The COVID Vaccine Agenda


Biased study about zinc and Vitamin C


  • Here is a recent and widely publicized study saying there is no benefit from Zinc and Vitamin C.

    The Authors got funding from major drug companies.

    But this is their claim.

    "Primary Outcome:

    There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of days required to reach a 50% reduction in symptoms among the 4 study groups. Patients who received usual care without supplementation achieved a 50% reduction in symptoms in a mean (SD) of 6.7 (4.4) days compared with a mean (SD) of 5.5 (3.7) days for patients receiving ascorbic acid, a mean (SD) of 5.9 (4.9) days for patients receiving zinc gluconate, and a mean (SD) of 5.5 (3.4) days for patients receiving both ascorbic acid and zinc gluconate supplementation"

    So wait? Zinc and Vitamin C caused a full 1-day reduction in symptoms - but that is not significant? Out of 6 days total? that is almost a 20% reduction in length.

    Plus - they never had the participants take Quercetin, which is necessary to get the zinc into your cells properly.

    But another biased study is expected. Just take your vaccines!!

    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2776305?utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=content-shareicons&utm_content=article_engagement&utm_medium=social&utm_term=021221#.YCasKShNqeg.twitter

Notmyarm.com is a global community discussion forum dedicated to providing an open platform for free uncensored speech surrounding COVID.Notmyarm.com is a global community discussion forum dedicated to providing an open platform for free uncensored speech surrounding COVID.


Login Register
Forgot Password?

Privacy Policy
Terms Of Service

Privacy Policy
Terms Of Service

Notmyarm.com is completely funded by you. We depend on your donations to fund our open source technology on independent servers. This ensures a platform free from censorship and "corporate" or government control. Please help us by making a donation via Paypal or Credit Card: