Miscarriages and Other Tragic Side Effects of the mRNA Shots (Mercola.com)
Miscarriages and Other Tragic Side Effects of the mRNA
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked
Many athletes are now losing their careers due to COVID jab injuries. Florian Dagoury is
the world record holder in static breath-hold freediving. Before his Pfizer jabs, he was
able to hold his breath for 10 minutes and 30 seconds. After his second dose, his diving
performance was slashed by about 30%, and he’s been diagnosed with myocarditis,
pericarditis and trivial mitral regurgitation
Others include tennis player Jeremy Chardy and 32-year-old triathlete Antoine Mechin.
Both were severely injured by their COVID jabs. Both now regret taking the shot.
“Damaging healthy people to preserve the health of the weakest,” Mechin now says, is “a
choice of backward logic”
By any objective measure, the COVID shots are the most dangerous drugs ever launched.
The safety signal is absolutely massive
A troubling effect that isn’t getting the attention it deserves is miscarriage. As of
November 19, 2021, 3,071 miscarriages had been reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse
Events Reporting System (VAERS)
Getting the COVID shot during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy is extremely risky.
Preliminary data published in April 2021 show miscarriage occurred in 82% to 91% of
women who got the shot during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy
With each passing day, the list of people suffering tragic consequences from the novel
gene therapies marketed as COVID “vaccines” gets longer. Slews of professional and
amateur athletes have collapsed and died in recent weeks, and mainstream media act
as if those things are either normal or inexplicable.
They’re neither. They’re abnormal, and totally explainable when you know how the
COVID shot destroys your heart and clumps your blood. Among the latest victims is
Florian Dagoury, world record holder in static breath-hold freediving. Before his Pfizer
jabs, he was able to hold his breath for 10 minutes and 30 seconds.
After his second dose, his diving performance was slashed by about 30%, and he’s been
diagnosed with myocarditis, pericarditis and trivial mitral regurgitation, a condition in
which the mitral valve in the heart gets leaky, allowing blood to flow backward into the
Dagoury shared his experience on Instagram:
“After my 2nd dose I noticed that my heart rate was way higher than normal and
my breath hold capacities went down significantly. During sleep, I’m at 65-
70bpm instead of 37-45bpm. During the day, I’m now always over 100bpm
instead of 65bpm, even when I sit down and relax. Once I even reach[ed]
177bpm while having dinner with friends!
Ten days after my 2nd jab, I went to see a cardiologist and he told me it’s a
common side effect of Pfizer vaccine, nothing to worry about, just rest, it will
pass. 40 days after 2nd jab, I had no progress so I went to see another
cardiologist and got diagnosed with myocarditis and trivial mitral regurgitation!
Which is basically an inflammation of the heart muscles cause by the immune
system and some tiny leaks of blood from the valves that no longer close
properly. I’m now struggling to reach 8 min breath hold, 150m dyn[amic apnea
freediving] and I even have a strong urge to breath[e] doing 40m dives. 30%
decrease on my diving performance roughly.”
Many Athletes Are Losing Their Careers
Other professional athletes whose careers are now on hold include French tennis player
Jeremy Chardy, who commented on his situation:
“Since I had my vaccine ... I am struggling. I can’t train. I can’t play ... It’s
frustrating, especially that I don’t have 10 years left to play. I regret having the
vaccine, but I could not have known that this would happen ... it’s difficult
because I was having fun and I want to play longer.”
Another one is Antoine Mechin, a 32-year-old triathlete whose career is on indefinite
hold, as he developed pulmonary embolism after taking his second dose of Moderna.
What makes it all the more tragic is that Mechin suffered pain and shortness of breath
after the first shot, but he was told his symptoms were probably just stress and fatigue.
He went ahead with the second, and now has severe lung damage. Mechin said:
“Damaging healthy people to preserve the health of the weakest, a choice of
backward logic. I would not get vaccinated again if it had to be done again.”
Largest Safety Signal in the History of Medicine
By any objective measure, the COVID shots are the most dangerous drugs ever
launched. The safety signal is absolutely massive. Here’s a screenshot summary from
OpenVAERS’ November 19, 2021, report (the latest available at the time of this article),
listing some of the most common effects reported following the COVID jab.
According to calculations by Steve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early
Treatment Fund, adverse events are conservatively underreported by a factor of 41, so
it’s possible we need to multiply these numbers by 41 to get closer to the real-world
For a visual illustration of how dangerous the COVID shots are in comparison to all other
vaccines on the market, just look at this OpenVAERS graph. It speaks for itself.
Ignored Safety Signal: Post-Injection Miscarriages
While we’re starting to hear more about the heart damage and strokes the COVID shots
cause, a troubling effect that isn’t getting the attention it deserves is miscarriage. As of
November 19, 2021, 3,071 miscarriages had been reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse
Events Reporting System (VAERS). There were also:
18,024 cases of menstrual disorders
6,654 cases of vaginal/uterine hemorrhage
1,216 cases of testicular pain or swelling
395 cases of erectile dysfunction
All of these effects point to the shots having an adverse impact on human reproductive
health. A recent paper in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law addresses
reproductive concerns, noting that while “the use of mRNA vaccines in pregnancy is now
generally considered safe ... the influential CDC-sponsored article by Shimabukuro et.
al. (2021) used to support this idea, on closer inspection, provides little assurance ...”
In particular, getting the COVID shot during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy is extremely
risky — the risk of miscarriage is anywhere between 82% and 91% — but Shimabukuro
et. al. hid this stunning finding in their paper. Here’s how they did it.
How Shimabukuro et. al. Hid Massive Safety Signal
According to Shimabukuro et. al., the miscarriage rate within the first 20 weeks of
pregnancy was 12.6% (104 miscarriages out of 827 pregnancies), which is only slightly
above the normal average of 10%. However, there’s a distinct problem with this
calculation. As explained in the Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law paper:
“... closer inspection of the 827 women in the denominator of this calculation
reveals that between 700 to 713 women were exposed to the vaccine after the
timeframe for recording the outcome had elapsed (up to 20 weeks of
To clarify, Shimabukuro et. al. included women in the group of 827 who actually didn’t
get the shot during their first 20 weeks of pregnancy. Since they didn’t get the shot until
later in the pregnancy, they would not have been AT RISK for miscarriage from the shot
in the first trimester.
Put another way, since the third trimester is after week 20, you should not include
women who got the shot in the third trimester when you’re trying to determine the
miscarriage rate among those injected BEFORE week 20. I hope that’s clear.
If you only include women who were at risk for side effects during the first 20 weeks,
because they actually got the shot during those first 20 weeks, then there are only 114
or, at most, 127 of them left in that group. And that changes the calculation
considerably! What we actually have are 104 miscarriages out of 127, which is 82%, or
possibly as high as 104 out of 114, which is 91%.
Of those 104 miscarriages, 96 of them occurred before 13 weeks of gestation, which
strongly suggests that getting a COVID shot during the first trimester is an absolute
recipe for disaster.
The Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law paper points out several other problems
with Shimabukuro’s analysis that compound the confusion, including the fact that they
used overlapping periods of exposure and outcome:
“Exposure to the vaccine was defined by trimester (periconception, first,
second, and third). Outcomes were defined as women first exposed to the
mRNA vaccine before 20 weeks’ gestation; and first exposed from 20 weeks’
gestation. The infant was followed for 28 days during the perinatal period
This strikes me as an intentional misdirection strategy to confuse and obfuscate. They
could easily have used the same periods for exposure and outcome, either the three
trimesters or weeks 1 through 20 and weeks 21 through 40.
Other adverse event statistics included a preterm birth rate of 9.4% (60 out of 636
births), a 3.2% incidence of small size for gestational age, and a 2.2% incidence of birth
defects (16 out of 724 births).
Another Problem With Shimabukuro’s Paper
Another minor detail found in Shimabukuro’s paper hints at an effort to downplay and
hide the miscarriage risk. The authors claim the normal rate of miscarriage in the
published literature is between 10% and 26%.
However, the 26% rate includes clinically-unrecognized pregnancies, and since the
cohort under investigation included only clinically-RECOGNIZED pregnancies — meaning
women who knew they were pregnant — that 26% statistic does not apply. Basically, it’s
included to confuse you into believing that the miscarriage incidence is far higher than it
Looking at statistical data, the risk of miscarriage drops from an overall, average risk
rate of 21.3% for the duration of the pregnancy as a whole, to just 5% between Weeks 6
and 7, all the way down to 1% between Weeks 14 and 20.
So, when you consider that the normal risk for miscarriage is just 5% by the time you
enter Week 6 (and many women don’t even realize they’re pregnant before that time), an
82% to 91% risk of miscarriage is no negligible increase. This should also make
everyone realize that recommending this injection to pregnant women is a reprehensible
crime against humanity.
Giving pregnant women experimental gene-based therapies is reprehensibly
irresponsible, and to suggest that safety data are “piling up” is nothing but pure
propaganda. Everything is still in the experimental stage and all data are preliminary. It’ll
take years to get a clearer picture of how these injections are affecting young women
and their babies.
Considering the evidence presented here, we
suggest the immediate withdrawal of mRNA vaccine
use in pregnancy (Category X) and those
breastfeeding, alongside the withdrawal of mRNA
vaccines to children or those of child-bearing age in
the general population ... ~ Science, Public Health
Policy, and the Law, November 2021”
Breastfeeding women also need to be aware that the mRNA in the COVID shot, as well
as spike protein, can transfer through breast milk. This is another way by which infants
can be put at risk for acute and/or longer term health problems. So, if you got a COVID
shot after giving birth, please understand that you are not transferring protective
You’re transferring the vaccine itself, and the toxic spike protein your body produces, to
your baby. In March 2020, a 5-month-old infant died from thrombotic thrombocytopenia
purpura within days of his mother receiving her second dose of the Pfizer vaccine. In
addition to that lethal case, there are at least 72 other cases where toddlers have had an
adverse reaction to breast milk from a vaccinated mother.
There Are Plenty of Cause for Concern
In closing, I urge you to read through these selected highlights from the Science, Public
Health Policy, and the Law paper:
“The sweeping conclusions of safety that Shimabukuro et al. (2021) make are
not convincing ... [M]echanisms which may be disrupted by the injection include
syncytin-1 (syn1), a fusogenic protein of retroviral origin, essential for cell
fusion and placental development.
Studies are required to determine if mRNA encoded spike (S) protein HR1 (or
HR1a28) or HR2 has the ability to inadvertently inhibit syn1, preventing the cell
fusion required for placental attachment, resulting in pregnancy loss.
The rodent studies carried out by Pfizer and Moderna to determine if there
could be an impact on fertility and development may need to be repeated in Old
World primates, such as macaques, as they have similar syn1 and syn2 proteins
to humans, whereas rats do not.
The presence of autoantibodies to syn1 was investigated by Mattar et al., and
although a change from baseline of autoantibodies to syn1 occurred in all 15
pregnant women exposed to the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech product, the
change was not deemed high enough to be considered biologically significant.
Given the small sample size, these findings may indicate that further
investigation is required. Further, an altered syn1 expression is associated with
pre-eclampsia, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets syndrome,
intrauterine growth restriction and gestational diabetes mellitus in
Synctyin-1 is also required for gamete fusion (syn1 and ACET2 receptors
present in sperm and oocytes) and, additionally, found in the testes34 and
ovaries. In the Comirnaty (Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine) Package Insert
submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the manufacturers state
that potential impairment of male fertility has not been evaluated ...
We question the conclusions of the Shimabukuro et al. study to support the use
of the mRNA vaccine in early pregnancy ... The assumption that exposure in the
third trimester cohort is representative of the effect of exposure throughout
pregnancy is questionable and ignores past experience with drugs such as
Evidence of safety of the product when used in the first and second trimesters
cannot be established until these cohorts have been followed to at least the
perinatal period or long-term safety determined for any of the babies born to
mothers inoculated during pregnancy.
Additionally, the product’s manufacturer, Pfizer, contradicts these assurances,
stating: ‘available data on Comirnaty administered to pregnant women are
insufficient to inform vaccine- associated risks in pregnancy,’ and ‘it is not
known whether Comirnaty is excreted in human milk’ as ‘data are not available
to assess the effects of Comirnaty on the breastfed infant’...
Due to the nature of the mRNA vaccine roll-out, healthcare providers need to
report any issues in pregnancy to further determine the safety of this product ...
Considering the evidence presented here, we suggest the immediate
withdrawal of mRNA vaccine use in pregnancy (Category X) and those
breastfeeding, alongside the withdrawal of mRNA vaccines to children or those
of child-bearing age in the general population, until more convincing data
relating to the safety and long-term impacts on fertility, pregnancy and
reproduction are established in these groups.”
Sources and References
Instagram Florian Dagoury
Thecovidworld.com Florian Dagoury
thecovidworld.com Jeremy Chardy
Open VAERS Summary Report November 19, 2021
Open VAERS Reproductive Health Data as of November 19, 2021
Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law November 2021; 4: 130-143
NEJM 2021; 384: 2273-2282
Medical News Today January 12, 2020
Twitter Alex Berenson April 23, 2021
Twitter VAERS detail
Medalerts.org 11/5/2021 VAERS data
Terms Of Service
Terms Of Service
Notmyarm.com is completely funded by you. We depend on your donations to fund our open source technology on independent servers. This ensures a platform free from censorship and "corporate" or government control. Please help us by making a donation via Paypal or Credit Card: