In 2021, start earning cash from your home and getting paid(500$ to 700$ / hour ) by this job. These are the best online jobs I’ve made $84, 8254 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student. Join it today here...http://www.maxweatlh.com
Scientists Mystified at How Sub-Saharan Africa Avoids
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked
Scientists appear stymied by the low number of infections and deaths in sub-Saharan
Africa where the vaccination rate is less than 6%
Africa has 17.46% of the world's population and 3% of the COVID-19 global death toll
while countries with better health care have higher death rates, including the Americas
with 46% and Europe with 29%
Nigeria, with the highest population, has had 3,000 deaths in 200 million people, which is
what is recorded in the U.S. every two or three days. Yet, Nigeria has announced an allout vaccination program to "prepare for the next wave"
Factors that may have influenced the low infection and death rate are outdoor living that
raises vitamin D levels, a younger population and access to medications and herbs used
for other local conditions, but which are also known to reduce the severity of COVID
19 outcomes in Scotland and Sweden. By March 2020, Scotland had implemented
strict lockdowns and closed schools and other social venues. People were threatened
with police fines if they went outside other than to exercise once a day, go to work or buy
On the other hand, Sweden handled the pandemic differently than most of the globe and
was initially vilified for looser restrictions and a lack of severe lockdown measures. In
October 2020, TIME called the response a "disaster," but data have shown that the death
rate in Sweden was in line with other years. In other words, excess deaths that may
have been attributed to COVID-19 were minimal.
Information compiled by CAN films showed the response in Sweden, which has nearly
double the population of Scotland, had significantly less impact on the economy and
health of their population, as well as nearly half the percentage of excess deaths as did
Scotland. Scotland had three lockdowns, 64 school closures and a 54% increase in
weight gain, while Sweden had no lockdowns, no school closures and zero weight gain.
Sub-Saharan African Continent Has Avoided COVID-19
Over the Thanksgiving 2021 break, media outlets broke the news of a new COVID-19
variant, dubbed Omicron, that was identified in South Africa. This variant is different in
that doctors are reporting “unusual,” but mild symptoms, with fatigue being the most
common complaint. In response, the rest of the world immediately instituted travel bans
to and from South Africa.
Interestingly, the steps taken in Africa throughout the pandemic have varied depending
on the country, yet the infection and death rate were relatively stable and low across the
continent. Over the last year there have been reports of small areas in the world where
the number of infections, deaths or case fatality rates have been significantly lower than
the rest of the world.
For example, India's Uttar Pradesh State reported a recovery rate of 98.6% and no
further infections. On the other hand, the entire continent of Africa appears to have
sidestepped the massive number of infections and deaths predicted for these poorly
funded countries with overcrowded cities.
Early estimations were that millions would die when the pandemic swept across Africa.
However, that scenario has not materialized. According to AP News, less than 6% of
the continent is vaccinated and for months, the World Health Organization has called
Africa "one of the least affected regions in the world."
In a busy crowded market outside Harare, AP News spoke with Nyasha Ndou, who
carries a mask in his pocket. Hundreds of other people, mostly unmasked, were in the
marketplace. Ndou explained the mask in his pocket:
"COVID-19 is gone, when did you last hear of anyone who has died of COVID19? The mask is to protect my pocket. The police demand bribes so I lose
money if I don't move around with a mask."
According to data from WorldoMeter, the population of Africa makes up 17.46% of the
world's population Yet, AP News reports that the WHO data reveal deaths in Africa are
3% of the global total, while deaths in countries with better health care are much higher,
such as 46% in the Americas and 29% in Europe.
Nigeria has the highest population in Africa and the government has recorded just 3,000
deaths in the 200 million people who live in the country. In the U.S., AP News reports
there are that many deaths every two or three days.
Some Credit Early Lockdowns With Low Number of Infections
Across the world, countries and communities went into lockdown to supposedly help
"flatten the curve" and slow the spread of the virus. Lesotho, the southernmost
landlocked country in the world and surrounded by South Africa, locked down their
country and their borders before a single person got sick.
In March 2020, the country declared an emergency, closed the schools and went into a
three-week lockdown. In early May, the lockdown was lifted, and the country recorded its
first confirmed cases. The BBC reported in October 2020 that in a country of 2 million
people they recorded 40 deaths in five months and approximately 1,700 cases.
That number rose to 4,137 cases by January 2021 as citizens from South Africa were
crossing the border during the holiday season. In addition to border crossings, the
government had been releasing people early from quarantine over cost concerns.
However, experts believe thousands of people had crossed the border illegally because
they were unable to afford to pay for their COVID-19 test. In response to the rising
number of COVID-19 cases in January, the prime minister imposed a curfew on social
venues such as bars and nightclubs at 8 pm.
While the quick action that some countries took to lock down their population may have
slowed the spread of the virus in the early days, the SARS-CoV-2 is endemic. This means
that it is in the environment and no amount of lockdown will eliminate the virus.
It also means that once lockdowns are opened again, the virus will continue to spread,
just like flu and cold viruses. Countries like Lesotho that locked down early have
experienced infections after the lockdown was lifted. The one advantage to flattening
the curve and reducing the number of infections early in the pandemic was that doctors
could have used the time to improve treatment protocols.
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko and the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance are two
examples of physicians and physician groups that developed treatment protocols during
2020 that have proven to be successful and reduce the number of individuals with
severe disease or long-haul symptoms.
Factors That May Influence the Infection Rate
There are several factors that may influence the infection rates in Africa. In the video
above, Dr. John Campbell points to the dramatic reduction in COVID-19 cases in Japan
that began in August, just 12 days after doctors were allowed to legally prescribe
ivermectin to their patients.
Using Google Translate, Campbell learned Dr. Haruo Ozaki, chairman of the Tokyo
Medical Association, had taken notice of the low number of infections and deaths in
Africa where many use ivermectin prophylactically and as the core strategy to treat
onchocerciasis, a parasitic disease also known as river blindness. More than 99% of
people infected live in 31 African countries.
Other medications that are commonly available in Africa have also demonstrated
effectiveness against COVID-19. For example, hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine have
long been used in the treatment and prevention of malaria. Zelenko has published
successful results using hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19.
Malaria is one of the leading causes of death in many developing nations in Africa. The
illness is triggered by a parasite carried by an infected female mosquito and
characterized by flu-like symptoms. Delays in treatment increase the severity of the
illness and the risk of death. According to the WHO there were 219 million cases of
malaria diagnosed in 2017 and 92% of those were in the African region.
Finally, Artemisia annua, also known as sweet wormwood, is an herb used in
combination therapies to treat malaria. It was used in traditional Chinese medicine for
more than 2,000 years to treat fever. Today artemisinin, a metabolite of Artemisia, is the
current therapeutic option for malaria. The plant has also been studied since the 2003
SARS outbreak for the treatment of coronaviruses, with good results.
As the BBC points out, the average age in most African countries is much lower than in
the rest of the world. Since many who have died are over the age of 80, and the median
age in Africa is 19 years, infections are far less likely to result in death. Only 3% of the
population is over age 65 as compared to 16.9% in North America and 19.2% in
In addition, residential care facilities for the elderly are rare in most African countries.
Weather may also play a part in who gets COVID: Early in the pandemic, researchers
from the University of Maryland discovered there was a correlation between the
spread of COVID-19 and temperature, humidity and latitude. They found the virus
appears to spread better when humidity and temperatures drop.
In addition, temperate weather and sunny skies such as those you see in Africa increase
the likelihood that a population will have optimal levels of vitamin D. Researchers have
discovered that maintaining optimal levels of vitamin D reduces the potential for
infection and lowers the risk of severe disease.
How Does Vaccination in Sub-Saharan Africa Make Sense?
The low numbers of COVID-19 in the sub-Saharan African population continue despite a
less than 6% vaccination rate. Meanwhile. Western nations' vaccination rates are
soaring, yet they struggle with rising infection and death rates. With statistics like this,
why are Nigerian officials seemingly overlooking the country's low numbers and health
status by announcing they would be stepping up their immunization schedule, with
hopes to give the shot to half the population before February.
Put simply, their target is "herd immunity" in a population that is not suffering. Oyewale
Tomori, is a virologist from Nigeria who sits on several WHO advisory groups. He
believes the vaccination level does not need to be as high as it is in the West. Salim.
But Abdool Karim, an epidemiologist in South Africa who has advised the government in
the past on COVID-19, disagrees. He is calling for an all-out vaccination program to
"prepare for the next wave," which negates what has happened in Africa in the last 20
months. He says, "Looking at what's happening in Europe, the likelihood of more cases
spilling over here is very high."
So, as African countries which have had lower rates of infection and deaths since the
start of the pandemic vaccinate more and more of their population, one can't help but
wonder: Once vaccination programs are underway, will the death rates climb as they
have in other areas of the world where vaccination levels are high?
And if they do, how will the "health experts" explain the sudden rising number of
infections and deaths on a continent that has thus far avoided pandemic levels of
Sources and References
AP News, November 19, 2021
Bitchute, November 18, 2021
The Scottish Parliament, November 26, 2021, March 16-20, 2020
The Times, March 4, 2021
KOMO News, October 14, 2021
TIME October 14, 2020
medRxiv, 2020; doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.11.20229708
Bitchute, November 18, 2021 Min 1:25 & 1:59 & 2:25 & 3:23
The Epoch Times November 27, 2021
Quartz Africa, August 23, 2021
Christianity Daily, September 17, 2021
WorldoMeter, Africa Population
WorldoMeter, Current World Population
BBC, October 8, 2020
The Guardian, January 8, 2021
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2020;56(6)
Yahoo! News, June 9, 2021
Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2020; doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001250
COVID-19 Early Treatment, Ivermectin
YouTube, November 23, 2021 Min 1:30
Tokyo Web, August 13, 2021
YouTube, November 23, 2021 Min 4:30
World Health Organization, Onchocerciasis
Pharmacology Therapeutics, 2020;216
World Atlas, Countries with the Highest Rates of Malaria
World Health Organization, Malaria
World Journal of Pharmacology, 2013;3(4)
Natural Product Insider, November 10, 2021
NutraIngredients, January 19, 2021
BBC, October 8, 2020 #3
Statistica, Share of Old Age Population in the U.S.
Eurostat, A Look at the Lives of the Elderly
JAMA Network Open, 2020;3(6)
Maryland Today, March 20, 2020
Endocrine Practice, 2021;27(5)
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 2021;14
Frontiers in Public Health, 2021;9(624559)
AP News, November 19, 2021, last 9 para
1, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 49
19, 20, 42
Planet Today, August 9, 2021
Becker’s Hospital Review, August 19, 2021
COVID-19 Data Science, October 20, 2021
Who’s the Real Anthony Fauci?
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. describes the coalition of sinister forces — intelligence agencies,
pharmaceutical companies, social media titans, medical bureaucracies, mainstream
media and the military — that are using a health crisis to impose totalitarian control
Anthony Fauci isn’t acting alone, but he’s become a prominent face of the medical cartel
and medical technocracy that is wrapped up in obliterating constitutional rights globally
Big Pharma’s infiltration of regulatory and public health agencies goes back more than
100 years to the creation of the Rockefeller Foundation in 1913, which took control of the
U.S. medical school system
Fauci controls a $6.1 billion budget that he distributes to colleges and universities to do
drug research for various diseases, and another $1.7 billion that comes from the military
to do bioweapons research
Fauci’s NIAID conducted barbaric and illegal drug experiments on foster children; at least
85 children died as a result
Waking up to Fauci’s façade is necessary to understand the orchestrated planned use of
pandemics to clamp down totalitarian control
— intelligence agencies, pharmaceutical companies, social media titans, medical
bureaucracies, mainstream media and the military — that are using a health crisis to
impose totalitarian control worldwide.
You can find all of the details in Kennedy’s bestselling book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,”
which contains more than 2,200 footnotes backing up its data. The truth is, Fauci, the
director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — part of the
U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) — isn’t acting alone.
But he’s become the prominent face of the medical cartel and medical technocracy that
is wrapped up in obliterating constitutional rights globally. And, as an authoritative
medical figure and trusted adviser to six presidents, Fauci’s words are treated as gospel,
despite the atrocities he’s committed.
Regulatory Agencies Turned Into Pharmaceutical Companies
Because of financial entanglements between pharmaceutical companies and the
agencies that regulate them, public health agencies in the U.S. have been turned into
veritable pharmaceutical companies. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, for
instance, receives 45% of its annual budget from Big Pharma, Kennedy explains.
The NIH, meanwhile, owns thousands of pharmaceutical patents, and the U.S. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention spends $4.9 billion a year out of its $12 billion
budget buying and distributing vaccines. “It is the biggest vaccine company in the
world,” Kennedy says. The NIH actually owns half the patent for Moderna’s COVID-19
injection, which means that if the shot is approved and/or mandated, it will make billions
of dollars as a result.
“Tony Fauci was able to choose, to designate, four of his high-level employees who each
get individual patent shares,” Kennedy explained. “They will collect $150,000 a year for
life if the Moderna vaccine is approved, which it has been.” Fauci’s agency, the NIAID, in
particular, no longer looks out for public health — and Fauci doesn’t either; his priority is
How Rockefeller Took Control of the Medical School System
One of the important parts of Kennedy’s new book is exposing the connection of Fauci
to Bill Gates and helping uncover how Gates patterned his strategy after Rockefeller.
The information was so compelling that I had my team create the video above to put
together the facts in the book into an easy-to-watch video so you can digest the material
Big Pharma’s infiltration of regulatory and public health agencies goes back more than
100 years to the creation of the Rockefeller Foundation in 1913. Just two years earlier,
John Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company had been ruled an unreasonable monopoly
and split into 34 companies, which became Exxon, Mobil, Chevron, Amoco, Marathon
The breakup only served to increase Rockefeller’s wealth, however, and the foundation
he created under his named was deemed “a menace to the future political and economic
welfare of the nation.”
The Foundation, in partnership with Andrew Carnegie and educator Abraham Flexner,
then set out to centralize U.S. medical schooling, orienting it to the “germ theory” of
disease, which states that germs are solely responsible for disease and necessitates
the use of pharmaceuticals to target said germs.
With that narrative in hand, Rockefeller financed the campaign to consolidate
mainstream medicine, adopt the philosophies of the growing pharmaceutical industry
and shutter its competition.
Rockefeller’s crusade caused the closure of more than half of U.S. medical schools,
fostered public and press scorn for homeopathy, osteopathy, chiropractic, nutritional,
holistic, functional, integrative and natural medicines, and led to the incarceration of
many practicing physicians.
The full story, including how the Rockefeller Foundation imbued its philosophy, precepts
and ideologies into the League of Nations Health Organization, which turned into the
World Health Organization, can be found in “The Real Anthony Fauci.”
Chronic Diseases Skyrocket Under Fauci’s Lead
In 1984, when Fauci was appointed director of NIAID, 11.8% of Americans had a chronic
disease. Contrast that to today, when 54% are now suffering from chronic illness. Fauci
doesn’t talk about this public health failure — at least not publicly — but as Kennedy
noted, it was Fauci’s job to figure out why autism, allergies and so many other diseases
have increased, identify the toxins causing them and eliminate them.
“Fauci could have prevented the whole thing,” Kennedy noted, referring to the epidemic
of chronic diseases now plaguing Americans, but instead of running a true public health
agency he turned it into an incubator for pharmaceutical products. According to
Kennedy, between 2009 and 2016, 240 new drug products were approved by the FDA,
and all of them came from Fauci.
“He has a $6.1 billion budget that he distributes to colleges and universities to do drug
research for various diseases,” Kennedy said. “He has another $1.7 billion that comes
from the military to do bioweapons research, and that is why he had to do the gain of
function … He was locked into that; 68% of his personal salary comes from doing
military/bioweapons research that used to be called ‘dual use.’”
Fauci Has Long Promoted Gain-of-Function Research
Dual use research is so named because it involves research on select agents and toxins
that could either benefit society or destroy it, depending on whether or not it falls into
the wrong hands. Fauci specifically spoke about dual use research of concern (DURC),
which involves 15 potentially deadly pathogens like smallpox and Ebola virus, at a
hearing before the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs at the
U.S. Senate, held April 26, 2012.
DURC involves seven categories of research experiments, according to the CDC, which
includes gain of function (GOF) and which may enhance the harmful consequences of
the agent or toxin, among others. Because GOF and DURC can be used to make
pathogens more readily able to infect humans, they pose major biosecurity risks.
After the 2001 anthrax attacks, the CIA began pouring money into bioweapons research.
The Pentagon was nervous about conducting such studies because it was prohibited, so
cohorts funneled money to Fauci to do it, Kennedy said. Because he called it dual use
“vaccine research,” it was allowed to continue.
Another moratorium was placed on U.S.-funded GOF research in October 2014, after a
string of concerning events, including publication of controversial GOF studies and highprofile “incidents” at U.S. biocontainment laboratories, led to more than 300 scientists
launching a petition calling for an end to GOF research.
That moratorium was lifted in December 2017, but in the meantime Fauci continued his
controversial research by funneling money to the Wuhan lab in China, partnering with
Chinese military scientists, and teaching them how to take bat coronaviruses and make
them transmissible to human beings.
“Fauci was giving them millions and millions of dollars,” Kennedy said, “but the biggest
contributor was the CIA, and the Pentagon through DARPA.” The three were all working
in tandem, teaching the Chinese how to weaponize bat viruses.
Fauci Experiments Killed at Least 85 Children
Fauci’s sordid past goes back to the AIDS crisis, which is now being used as a template
for what’s happening during COVID-19, and the fabrication of past pandemics, including
Zika virus, for the purpose of selling pharmaceuticals and advancing totalitarian control.
One of the most atrocious acts, however, included barbaric and illegal experiments that
the NIAID conducted on children, testing pharmaceuticals. Fauci “got control of foster
homes in seven states and turned pharmaceutical companies loose on these children,”
“The children were tortured. They did not have legal representation, which is
illegal. They did not have guardians. You cannot put a child into a clinical trial in
this country without a legal guardian. And he made sure that those kids did not
have guardians. They were literally tortured to death … many of the kids did not
have HIV, they were just guinea pigs.
The children who refused or were noncompliant were sent to Columbia Hospital
and had feeding tubes installed in them so the drug companies could
administer the drugs even when the kids fought back. At least 85 of these kids
died during the experiments.”
A graveyard was found in Hawthorne, New York, with a pit covered by an Astroturf
carpet that had hundreds of tiny coffins piled up with the bodies of these children inside,
Kennedy said. “After New York, he took that roadshow to Africa and ended up killing
many pregnant mothers and getting away with it.”
Using Fear to Disable Critical Thinking
Waking up to Fauci’s façade is necessary to understand the orchestrated planned use of
pandemics to clamp down totalitarian control. One sign of the ensuing control is the
deep involvement of intelligence agencies in the pandemic process, even though they’re
not health agencies. Kennedy explains:
“The intelligence agencies and health agencies have developed these
extraordinary techniques for using fear to disable critical thinking. If you look at
the whole rationale behind this pandemic, all of these rationales collapse.
Why are we mandating vaccines that don’t prevent transmission? What is the
possible reason? That’s just one of many absurdities of what we’re doing today.
But people who are subsumed in the orthodoxy, which is the product of
orchestrated fear, misinformation and propaganda, need to be woken up.”
He references the now-infamous experiment conducted by Yale University psychologist
Stanley Milgram in 1962, during which he tested the limits of human obedience to
authority. The Milgram experiment was conducted following the trial of Nazi Adolf
Eichmann, who used the Nuremberg defense, or “befehl ist befehl,” which translates to
“an order is an order.”
The Milgram experiment clearly showed that people would act against their own
judgment and harm another person to extreme lengths simply because they were told to
do so. What does this mean for the future, if people blindly obey and submit to
totalitarian control? Kennedy said:
“I think this is historical jeopardy to humanity that we’ve never seen before. You
know, the black plague and WWII are arguably rivals for it. But I would argue
that this is the worst thing that has ever happened to humanity because the
essential ambition of the totalitarian state is to control, not just conduct, but
self-expression and thought.
And for the first time in history, because of the technological revolution, the
capacity for totalitarian forces to literally control every aspect of human
expression and even human thought is now unprecedented.”
Waking Up to the Truth
In China, a vast array of facial recognition technology that claims to be able to read guilt
on a person from a distance has reportedly already been deployed. “This is precrime,”
Kennedy says, like the movie “Minority Report.” In such a technocratic world, however —
unlike at any point in history — there’s nowhere to run, and nowhere to hide:
“In Hitler’s time you could run for the border, and there were ways that a certain
number of people were going to escape. They were going to regroup and there
was opposition from other countries.
Today, we have this situation where the U.S. military and the CIA are conspiring
with the Chinese CDC and military scientists, developing bioweapons together
and conspiring to lie to the public … We have U.S. federal officials who are
conspiring with Chinese military officials to hide truth from the American
“I would say this is Armageddon,” Kennedy said. “This is the apocalyptical forces of
ignorance and greed and totalitarianism. This is the final battle. We need to win this
one,” and the first step to doing so is waking up to the truth.
Sources and References
The Corbett Report, The Real Anthony Fauci November 19, 2021
The Corbett Report, The Real Anthony Fauci November 19, 2021, 7:18
The Corbett Report, The Real Anthony Fauci November 19, 2021, 8:31
The Corbett Report, The Real Anthony Fauci November 19, 2021, 10:00
The Corbett Report, The Real Anthony Fauci November 19, 2021, 13:00
GovInfo.gov Hearing before the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs at the U.S.
Senate April 26, 2012
U.S. CDC, Dual Use Research of Concern and Bird Flu: Questions & Answers
The Cambridge Working Group July 14, 2014
The Corbett Report, The Real Anthony Fauci November 19, 2021, 34:10
The Corbett Report, The Real Anthony Fauci November 19, 2021, 43:00
University of California, Milgram’s Experiment on Obedience to Authority
The Corbett Report, The Real Anthony Fauci November 19, 2021, 49:00
The Corbett Report, The Real Anthony Fauci November 19, 2021, 52:00
Omicron Variant and Vaccine Resistance
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked
Another SARS-CoV-2 variant dubbed Omicron has reportedly arisen in fully “vaccinated”
patients in Botswana. Handfuls of cases have also emerged in other areas of the world
In response, Japan, Israel and Morocco have closed their borders to all foreign travelers.
The U.S., the U.K., Canada and the European Union have banned travelers from southern
Africa specifically. Australia has delayed its reopening plans and China has announced a
“zero-tolerance approach” to the new variant
Fear over Omicron is likely unjustified, as it appears far milder than previous strains.
Primary symptoms of infection include extreme fatigue for a couple of days, headache,
body aches, scratchy throat and intermittent dry cough. No severe cases have been
While the mass vaccination campaign appears to be driving the rapid mutation of the
virus, governments around the world continue to double down on this failed strategy
According to National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Dr. Anthony
Fauci, Omicron might evade both monoclonal antibodies and COVID shot-induced
antibodies, but he insists getting the COVID shot (if unvaccinated) or a booster if “fully
vaccinated” is your best bet
imposed lockdowns and border closings, the technocratic elite would really like
everyone to panic about this one.
In response, Japan, Israel and Morocco immediately closed their borders to all foreign
travelers. The U.S., the U.K., Canada and the European Union banned travelers from
southern Africa specifically. Australia delayed its reopening plans and China announced
a “zero-tolerance approach” to the new variant. But is the fear justified? Probably not.
While the Omicron variant appears to spread more rapidly than previous mutations, and
affects people younger than 40 to a greater degree than before, there’s no evidence that
it has a higher lethality. On the contrary, it may actually be milder.
That seems to be the opinion of Dr. Angelique Coetzee, chair of the South African
Medical Association, who discovered the Omicron variant, who in a recent interview (see
video above) said:
“Looking at the mildness of the symptoms that we are seeing — apparently,
there’s no reason for panicking as we don’t see severely ill patients… The most
predominant complaint is severe fatigue for one or two days, with headache,
body aches and pain.
Some will have a scratchy throat and some will have a dry cough [that] comes
and goes. Those are more or less the big symptoms we have seen.”
Viruses Typically Mutate Into Less Dangerous Variants
This all makes sense, based on what we already know about viruses. As reported by
Paul Elias Alexander, Ph.D., with the Brownstone Institute:
“The WHO has said the Omicron variant can spread more quickly than other
variants. Likely true. The virus is behaving just like how viruses behave.
They are mutable and mutate, and via the Muller’s ratchet theory, we expect
these to be milder and milder mutations, not more lethal ones given the
pathogen seeks to infect the host and not arrive at an evolutionary dead end.
The virus will mutate downward so that it can use the host (us) to propagate
itself via our cellular metabolic machinery. The Delta variant has shown us this:
It is very infectious and mostly non-lethal — specially for children and healthy
[T]here is no reporting of increased virulence/lethality of this new Omicron
variant, and this will remain the case based on what we’ve seen from Delta and
prior variants. There are no guarantees, but we operate based on risk and all
things point to the same for this new variant.
Just because there might be a wave in South Africa does not mean there will be
waves in the U.S. or Israel or other places with greater natural immunity. This
was the prize of letting people enjoy day-to-day living.
The nations that have ended lockdowns are likely to move past this new variant
scare, and be fine. This is more of an overreaction by the WHO and
governments and much ado about nothing.”
Is a New Round of COVID Shots the Answer?
While the mass vaccination campaign appears to be driving the rapid mutation of the
virus, governments around the world continue to double down on this failed strategy.
More shots are the answer, they say.
National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Dr. Anthony Fauci
has stated Omicron might evade both monoclonal antibodies and COVID shot-induced
antibodies. Sticking to the same script, National Institutes of Health director Dr. Francis
Collins recently told Fox News viewers:
“Please, Americans, if you’re one of those folks who’s sort of waiting to see, this
would be a great time to sign up, get your booster. Or if you haven’t been
vaccinated already, get started.”
It’s befuddling, considering the shots don’t protect against infection or spread, and the
fact that Omicron apparently emerged in fully “vaccinated” patients. What’s more, if the
Omicron variant actually evades COVID shot-induced antibodies, what’s the point of
A vaccine-evading variant is clear evidence that mass vaccination is fueling more
problematic mutations, so the recommendations simply don’t jibe with the available
COVID Shots Are a Failure
In his article, Alexander highlights a long list of studies showing the COVID shots have
suboptimal efficacy, including the following:
The Lancet Infectious Diseases October 2021 — Fully “vaccinated” individuals who
develop breakthrough infections have a peak viral load similar to that of
unvaccinated people, and efficiently transmit the infection to unvaccinated and
“vaccinated” alike in household settings.
The Lancet Preprint — Fully “vaccinated” Vietnamese health care workers who
contracted breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Delta infections had viral loads that were 251
times higher than those found in cases infected with earlier strains. So, the shots do
not appear to protect against infection with the Delta strain.
A July 31, 2021, medRxiv preprint by Riemersma et. al. found no difference in viral
loads between unvaccinated people and those “fully vaccinated” who developed
breakthrough infections. They also found the Delta variant was capable of “partial
escape from polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies.”
Eurosurveillance rapid communication, July 2021 — An outbreak of the Delta
variant in a hospital in Finland suggested the shots did little to prevent the spread of
infection, even among the “vaccinated,” and despite routine use of face masks and
other protective equipment.
Eurosurveillance rapid communication, September 2021 — An upsurge of Delta
variant infections in Israel, at a time when more than 55% of the population were
“fully vaccinated,” also showed the COVID shots were ineffective against this variant.
The infection spread even to those who were fully jabbed AND wore surgical masks.
The Lancet Preprint, October 2021 — This Swedish study found the Pfizer
injection’s effectiveness progressively waned from 89% on Days 15 to 30, postinjection, to 42% from Day 181 onward. As of day 211, no protection against
infection was discernible. Moderna’s shot fared slightly better, waning to 59% as of
Day 181. The AstraZeneca injection offered lower protection than Pfizer and
Moderna from the start, and waned faster, reaching zero by day 121.
BioRxiv September 2021 — Six months after the second Pfizer shot, antibody
responses and T cell immunity against the original virus and known variants was
found to have substantially waned, in many cases reaching undetectable levels.
Journal of Infection August 2021 — When the Delta variant was the cause of the
infection, neutralizing antibodies had decreased affinity for the spike protein, while
antibodies that worsen infection had increased affinity.
The Lancet Infectious Diseases November 2021 — 26% of patients admitted to
hospital with confirmed severe or critical COVID-19 were “fully vaccinated;” 46% had
a positive COVID test but were asymptomatic, 7% had mild infection and 20% had
moderate illness. So, among those who developed symptoms of infection, the
majority ended up with severe or critical illness.
medRxiv August 2021 — People with no previous SARS-CoV-2 infection who got the
Pfizer shot had a 5.96-fold increased risk for breakthrough infection and a 7.13-fold
increased risk for symptomatic disease, compared to people who had natural
Can COVID-19 Injections Promote ADE?
Over the course of 2020, many published studies highlighted the risk of antibodydependent enhancement (ADE) following the COVID shots. For example, one October
28, 2020, paper stressed that:
“... vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of
the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit
neutralizing antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA
and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via
antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).”
While we’ve not seen conclusive evidence of ADE yet, there are signs that point in that
direction. Twenty years of research have demonstrated that making a vaccine against
coronaviruses is fraught with risk. In fact, most previous coronavirus vaccine efforts —
for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Middle East respiratory
syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and similar viruses
— have ended up triggering ADE.
What that means is that, rather than enhance your immunity against the infection, the
vaccine actually enhances the virus’ ability to enter and infect your cells, resulting in
more severe disease than had you not been vaccinated. The 2003 review paper
“Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Virus Infection and Disease” explains it this
“In general, virus-specific antibodies are considered antiviral and play an
important role in the control of virus infections in a number of ways. However, in
some instances, the presence of specific antibodies can be beneficial to the
virus. This activity is known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of virus
The ADE of virus infection is a phenomenon in which virus-specific antibodies
enhance the entry of virus, and in some cases the replication of virus, into
monocytes/macrophages and granulocytic cells through interaction with Fc
and/or complement receptors.
This phenomenon has been reported in vitro and in vivo for viruses representing
numerous families and genera of public health and veterinary importance.
These viruses share some common features such as preferential replication in
macrophages, ability to establish persistence, and antigenic diversity. For some
viruses, ADE of infection has become a great concern to disease control by
The 2014 paper, “Antibody-Dependent SARS Coronavirus Infection Is Mediated by
Antibodies Against Spike Proteins,” concluded that monoclonal antibodies generated
against SARS-CoV spike proteins actually promoted infection, and that overall,
“antibodies against SARS-CoV spike proteins may trigger ADE effects,” thereby raising
“questions regarding a potential SARS-CoV vaccine.”
So far, all Omicron cases have been relatively mild, but should it turn out that fully
“vaccinated” people are developing severe disease while the unvaccinated don’t, then
that would be an indication that ADE is at play.
SARS Vaccine Shown to Cause ADE
An interesting 2012 paper with the telling title, “Immunization with SARS Coronavirus
Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus,”
demonstrates what many researchers now fear, namely that COVID-19 vaccines may
end up making people more prone to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The paper reviews experiments showing immunization with a variety of SARS vaccines
resulted in pulmonary immunopathology once challenged with the SARS virus. As noted
by the authors:
“Inactivated whole virus vaccines whether inactivated with formalin or beta
propiolactone and whether given with our without alum adjuvant exhibited a
Th2-type immunopathologic in lungs after challenge.
As indicated, two reports attributed the immunopathology to presence of the N
protein in the vaccine; however, we found the same immunopathologic reaction
in animals given S protein vaccine only, although it appeared to be of lesser
Thus, a Th2-type immunopathologic reaction on challenge of vaccinated
animals has occurred in three of four animal models (not in hamsters) including
two different inbred mouse strains with four different types of SARS-CoV
vaccines with and without alum adjuvant. An inactivated vaccine preparation
that does not induce this result in mice, ferrets and nonhuman primates has not
This combined experience provides concern for trials with SARS-CoV vaccines
in humans. Clinical trials with SARS coronavirus vaccines have been conducted
and reported to induce antibody responses and to be ‘‘safe.” However, the
evidence for safety is for a short period of observation.
The concern arising from the present report is for an immunopathologic
reaction occurring among vaccinated individuals on exposure to infectious
SARS-CoV, the basis for developing a vaccine for SARS.
Additional safety concerns relate to effectiveness and safety against antigenic
variants of SARS-CoV and for safety of vaccinated persons exposed to other
coronaviruses, particularly those of the type 2 group.”
Higher Vaccination Rates, Higher Infection Rates
One trend that could be indicative of ADE is the fact that areas with higher vaccination
rates have higher infection rates. If the shots prevented infection, it would be the
opposite. The Waterford district in Ireland, for example, has a 99.7% vaccination rate,
the highest in the country, but also has the highest daily COVID case load.33
[G]overnments asked us for two weeks to flatten
the curve to help prepare hospitals so that they can
tend to surges and other non-COVID illnesses. We as
societies gave our governments two weeks, not 21
months. ~ Paul Elias Alexander, Ph.D.”
And, for some reason, the U.S. COVID mortality rate is higher in 2021 than it was in
2020, before the rollout of the shots, so clearly, they’re not helping matters. As noted
by Alexander in his Brownstone article:
“[G]overnments asked us for two weeks to flatten the curve to help prepare
hospitals so that they can tend to surges and other non-COVID illnesses. We as
societies gave our governments two weeks, not 21 months.
They failed to tend to the non-COVID illnesses, and we locked down the healthy
and well (children and young and middle aged healthy persons) while failing to
properly protect the vulnerable and high-risk persons such as the elderly ... This
failure rests on public health messaging and government.
Additionally, what did our governments in the U.S., Canada, UK, Australia etc. do
with the tax money for the hospitals and personal protective equipment (PPE),
etc.? Hospitals must be prepared by now. Governments have failed! Not the
people. The task forces have failed, not the people.”
Masks don’t work. Lockdowns don’t work. Shutting down small businesses and schools
don’t work. The COVID shots don’t work. Yet with the emergence of Omicron,
governments are reimplementing all of the same countermeasures that haven’t worked
for the past two years.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results. Yet
that’s what’s passing for “science” these days. The answer to this madness is massnoncompliance. We must peacefully reject these wholly unscientific and harmful
Sources and References
Peckford 42 November 27, 2021
NY Times COVID Live Updates (Archived)
Twitter Aaron Ginn November 28, 2021
Brownstone Institute November 26, 2021
ABC News November 28, 2021
The Lancet Infectious Diseases October 29, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00648-4
Lancet Preprint, Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Delta Among Vaccinated Health Care Workers, Vietnam
October 11, 2021
medRxiv July 31, 2021, DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.31.21261387
Eurosurveillance rapid communication July 2021; 26(30)
Eurosurveillance rapid communication September 2021; 26(39)
The Lancet Preprint October 25, 2021
BioRxiv September 30, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.09.30.462488
Journal of Infection August 9, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.inf.2021.08.010
The Lancet Infectious Diseases November 1, 2021; 21(11): 1485-1486
medRxiv August 25, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415
International Journal of Clinical Practice, October 28, 2020 DOI: 10.111/ijcp.13795
Twitter, The Immunologist April 9, 2020
PLOS Pathogens 2017 Aug; 13(8): e1006565
Swiss Medical Weekly April 16, 2020; 150:w20249
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications August 22, 2014; 451(2): 208-214
JCI Insight February 21, 2019 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.123158
PLOS ONE April 2012; 7(4): e35421 (PDF)
EBioMedicine 2020 May; 55: 102768, Introduction
PNAS.org April 14, 2020 117 (15) 8218-8221
Viral Immunology 2003;16(1):69-86
PLOS ONE April 2012; 7(4): e35421 (PDF), page 11
The Irish Times October 21, 2021
Forbes October 6, 2021
COVID Shots Are the Deadliest 'Vaccines' in Medical History
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked
Data suggest 1 in 317 boys aged 16 to 17 will get myocarditis from the COVID shots, and
after a third booster, that number may be even higher
VAERS reporting is likely underreported by a factor of 41. Since there are over 8,000
domestic deaths reported to VAERS, and 98% of those deaths are “excess deaths,” this
suggests that as many as 300,000 Americans may have died from the COVID shots thus
Calculations based on government data from 35% of the world’s population suggest we’re
killing approximately 411 people per million doses on average. Moderna and Pfizer are
both two-dose regimens, which pushes this to 822 deaths per million fully vaccinated.
And that’s just the short-term mortality. We still have no concept of how these shots
might impact mortality and morbidity in the longer term
An Italian investigation found that if the COVID mortality definition were changed to only
include those cases where there were no preexisting comorbidities, the mortality from
COVID comes out to just 2.9% of the overall reported number. This suggests that if a
COVID death was redefined to being a death actually “from” COVID rather than “with”
COVID, the death count could be substantially smaller than 760,000 deaths and may be
smaller than the number killed by the vaccines
The deadliest vaccine ever made is the smallpox vaccine, which killed 1 in 1 million
vaccinated people. The COVID shots kills 822 per million fully vaccinated, making it more
than 800 times deadlier than the deadliest vaccine in human history
In this interview, Steve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund,
reviews some of the COVID jab data he’s presented to the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during various
For example, during the September 17, 2021, FDA VRBPAC (Vaccines and Related
Biological Products Advisory Committee) meeting, Kirsch cited data suggesting 1 in
317 boys aged 16 to 17 will get myocarditis from the shots, and after a third booster,
that number may be even higher. He also cited data showing the Pfizer shot kills far
more people than it saves. I’ll provide more details about that below.
Kirsch didn’t come into this due to some preconceived opinion about vaccines. He and
his family have all received two doses of the COVID jab. It wasn’t until after the fact that
he started hearing about problems from others that he started taking deep dives into the
data. He explains:
“After I got vaccinated, a woman asked me, ‘Should I get vaccinated?’ And I
said, ‘Of course, you should. This is the safest thing ever. Nobody's died and
there are no side effects. You've got to get this modern technology.’ I'm singing
from the hymn book.
And then she said something that threw me off course because I said, ‘Why are
you asking such a stupid question?’ And she said, ‘Well, three of my relatives
got the vaccine and they died within a week.’ I said, ‘No, no, that can't be true.
There's no way that can happen.’
I'm trying to convince her that she's mistaken, that it must have been something
else. I wrote her saying, ‘Statistically, you can't have three people dying from the
vaccine, which doesn't kill anyone.’ And she wrote back and she said, ‘Yeah, but
That was a game-changing moment for me ... but I was still in denial ... I was
operating [from the position] that the FDA is still operating the same
[conservative] way [they used to before], but they're not ... nor did I understand
that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is now mission driven,
and the mission is to get a needle in every arm. My trust was in the agencies.
The next incident involved my carpet cleaner, Tim Damroth. He showed up
wearing a mask. And I'm saying, ‘Hey, you should all get vaccinated. Once you
get vaccinated you don't have to wear a mask.’ And he said, ‘Well, I did get
vaccinated, but I had an extreme reaction. I had a heart attack two minutes after
I got injected.’ He also described that his wife had [developed] Parkinson's-like
symptoms. Her left hand was shaking uncontrollably.”
The Price Truth-Tellers Pay
The data are ultimately what convinced him that people must be told the truth about
these shots because, without that, they cannot give informed consent. He’s sacrificed a
lot to do just that, including professional relationships and millions of dollars in lost
“I basically put my life on hold and started looking in the various databases and
talking to people to understand what was going on,” Kirsch says. “And every
place I looked, [the truth] became more clear to me. And so, on May 25, 2021, I
wrote this 250-page article for TrialSiteNews. It may be the longest article for
TrialSiteNews ever published.
When I wrote that article, within a week, every member of my [COVID-19 Early
Treatment Fund’s] scientific advisory board quit — there were 14 scientists from
all over the United States and in different fields with different expertise. They
said I was ‘an evil person’ and that they never wanted to talk to me again in their
I pleaded with them, saying, ‘Look, if I've got the analysis wrong, then tell why
can’t you tell me where I got it wrong.’ And they wouldn't say anything. They just
said, the vaccines are safe and I should be ashamed of myself.”
Kirsch also created and submitted a 177-page PDF slideshow to the October 26, 2021,
VRBPAC hearing, titled, “Questions About the COVID Vaccine.” It’s an absolute treasure
trove of information and I would encourage you to review this great resource that he is
updating in real time.
VAERS Data Likely Off by Factor of 41
In his video, “Vaccine Secrets: COVID Crisis,” the first episode of “The False Narrative
Takedown Series,” Kirsch explains how to estimate COVID jab mortality, which he and a
team of statisticians have done based on a variety of sources, including but not limited
to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).
Kirsch estimates VAERS reporting is off by a factor of 41, and that anywhere from
150,000 to 300,000 Americans have died from the COVID shots.
“We looked at eight different ways and VAERS is just one of the ways. So, when
people say, ‘You can't use VAERS for this, you can't [calculate] causality [based
on VAERS data], I'm saying, ‘Fine. We got the same answer using seven other
In the VAERS analysis, we determined that VAERS was under-reported by a
factor of 41, which is quite reasonable ... Ten years ago we had a system where
we could actually discover all the unreported things in VAERS, and they
discovered VAERS was severely underreported by as much as 95 times.
Vaccines that we thought were safe, they're not safe at all. So, what did they do?
They killed the project.
So, the reason that we have such a bad system today is that it is intentional. If
we had a good system, it would show all the flaws for all of these vaccines that
we've been giving people.”
The system is clearly intentionally designed from a technical standpoint to radically
decrease the number of cases entered. It takes more than 30 minutes to complete a
single report and you can’t save it until completed, so if you walk away and get timedout, you have to start all over.
Kirsch knows a neurologist in California who claims to have 2,000 COVID jab-injured
patients (out of a client base of 20,000), but she’s only filed two reports to VAERS. She
doesn’t have time for the rest. So, she’s under-reporting by a factor of 1,000. Also, while
doctors are required by law to file adverse event reports, there’s no enforcement, and no
punishment for not filing.
It is also important to note that no one is paid to enter this data. That could be a part
time job for most clinicians, were they to responsibly report all the side effects and
COVID Shots Are Far Deadlier Than the Infection
Overall, his team’s calculations suggest we’re killing 411 people per million doses (and
remember Moderna and Pfizer are both two-dose regimens), worldwide. And that’s just
the short-term mortality. We still have no concept of how these shots might impact
mortality in the longer term.
To put things into further perspective, October 21, 2021, an Italian investigation found
that by changing the COVID mortality definition to only include cases where COVID-19
was the primary cause of death and there were no comorbidities decreased the death
toll by 97%, from 130,000 to fewer than 4,000.
Kirsch believes the real death tally from COVID-19 in the U.S. may be about 50% of the
reported number. This means about 380,000 Americans died from COVID-19 (rather
than with COVID), whereas the COVID “vaccine” has killed as many as 300,000. In other
words, it’s possible that the cure may be worse than the disease.
COVID Shot Is the Deadliest ‘Vaccine’ Ever Created
It gets even worse though. In Pfizer’s children’s trial, one of the participants, 12-year-old
Maddie De Garay, suffered a number of devastating events, including paralysis. This
side effect was misreported, however, and put down as “abdominal pain.” Neither the
FDA nor the CDC has investigated the case, despite promising to do so. Pfizer has
refused to investigate it as well.
These COVID vaccines are over 800 times deadlier
than the deadliest vaccine in human history. So, this
isn't a close call. These vaccines are the deadliest
vaccines ever created by man. And they're promoted as
safe and effective. ~ Steve Kirsch”
In the youth trial, 1 out of 1,131 children was paralyzed. Meanwhile, Pfizer’s adult trial
shows that the shot saves one COVID death for every 22,000 fully-vaccinated people.
But for children, it’s estimated we need to fully vaccinate over 630,000 kids to save one
life. That means we may permanently disable as many as 557 kids per life saved.
Meanwhile, there’s not a single report of a healthy child dying from SARS-CoV-2
infection anywhere in the world.
This means the number needed to vaccinate to save one otherwise healthy child from
COVID death is actually infinite, as they’re not dying from COVID to begin with. There
simply is no doubt that in children, the COVID shot is no benefit and all risk. Kirsch
“Dr. Paul Offit was interviewed 20 years ago on ‘CBS 60 Minutes,’ and he said
the smallpox vaccine is so dangerous that we would never consider doing that
in modern times. It's the most dangerous vaccine ever invented ... and the
smallpox vaccines only kills one person per every million-people vaccinated,
which is a lot.
You vaccinate 300 million people, you're going to kill 300 people. That is
unacceptable according to Offit, but he just voted for a vaccine that kills 822
people per million fully vaccinated [assuming a two-dose regimen].
That means these COVID vaccines are over 800 times deadlier than the
deadliest vaccine in human history. So, this isn't a close call. These vaccines are
the deadliest vaccines ever created by man. And they're promoted as safe and
COVID Shot Gets Deadlier the Younger You Are
Based on a request from Dr. Peter McCullough, Kirsch also analyzed COVID jab mortality
based on age using the VAERS data. For 80-year-olds, he found we kill two people to
save one. For 20-year-olds, we kill six to save one.
The younger you are, the greater the risk. The Kostoff analysis found this general
pattern as well. Ronald N. Kostoff is a research affiliate in Gainesville, Virginia, who in
2016 wrote an expert review on under-reporting of adverse events in the biomedical
In a review published in October 2021, Kostoff found five elderly are killed by the shots
for each elderly person saved, and the ratios get worse as you go down in age. That
said, “the vaccines don't make sense for any age group, which is exactly the same thing I
found independently,” Kirsch says.
“Nobody should get these vaccines. There is no cost-benefit analysis that I have
seen that shows it is beneficial ... I mean, you're not going to take an
intervention that is just as likely to kill you as to save you.
You want to take an intervention which is at least 10 times more likely to save
you than to kill you, because it's an optional intervention. What kind of business
do you have taking an intervention which has a marginal benefit for a
completely unknown short- and long-term risk profile?
The other thing I want to say is that, the societal benefit argument, people are
saying, ‘You're selfish because you didn't get vaccinated.’ Well, that's irrational.
Have you ever seen a CDC analysis showing you the societal benefit of being
vaccinated? It doesn't exist. And there's a reason it doesn't exist, because the
societal benefit would be so tiny that it’s ludicrous. Today, we know the
vaccinated are as likely to spread the virus as the unvaccinated. So where is the
If there are no downsides [to the shot], then people would say, sure, maybe
there's some societal benefit. I'll do that. But here your life is at stake and the
data show that roughly 1 in 1,000 will get killed by these vaccines. So, if I say,
hey, suppose sacrificing your life could save 100 person years (e.g., 10 people
given another 10 years of life).
When I asked this live in a clubhouse room with a few hundred people, nobody
raised their hand to volunteer to do that — to sacrifice their life to save 100
person years. And I said, ‘OK, what about 1,000 person years? If you could
sacrifice your life to save people 1,000 person years, would you do it? Nobody
would do that. It's nonsensical.
We have a constitutional right to life ... And I don't think you're being selfish
about it. You have a family, you have friends, you have loved ones, you have
people you interact with ... Why would I ask you to sacrifice your life? To save
people you don’t know?
Everybody has their own special way that they contribute to society. Why would
we ever ask somebody to [sacrifice their life for a potential social benefit]?
Maybe we should ask Joe Biden, ‘Joe, if you could give up your life to save
1,000 person-years, would you do that?’ It would be very interesting to see what
CDC Performs Statistical Magic, Again
Countering all of this data we have a recent CDC analysis, which concluded that people
who get the COVID shot are two-thirds less likely to die of any cause.
“I sent Janet Woodcock my deck of 180 questions. I said, ‘Janet, I bet you can't
answer any of these 180 questions. Doesn't this concern you?’ She sends back
an email saying, ‘Look at the CDC analysis, showing that after you get the jab,
there's this two-thirds drop in mortality.’
My friends and I, when we saw in that paper, we were laughing our heads off
over here. The stats on 18- to 44-year-olds [show] 35% die from accidents. The
rest die from disease — cancer, heart disease, whatever.
The only way to get a two-thirds reduction [in all-cause mortality] is if nobody
dies from anything anymore — any disease — and we also reduce the number of
accidents that they have ... This is the immortality drug. All kidding aside,
there's no mechanism of action that could possibly justify that people are going
to be better off from a health perspective after getting these vaccinations. Zero.
Nothing is improved. You are not immortal. You are just the opposite; your
immune system is compromised. You're also more likely to get COVID. In the
U.K., the government numbers show that 40-year-olds, after the honeymoon
period is over, were more than twice as likely to get infected if they were
In the U.S., you have hospitals where you have a 50% community vaccination
rate and the hospital admissions are 90% vaccinated people. You can't make
these statistics up.
In fact, the CDC was confronted by these statistics by Aaron Siri, who wrote
about it on his substack, and they just ignored them. So, they make up stuff
[and] this paper shows the CDC can put out anything and as long as it has that
little CDC logo on it, people are going to believe it no matter how ridiculous it is.
And nobody in the medical community criticized it. I wrote a very popular article
about it on my substack entitled, ‘FDA Discovers Fountain of Youth.’”
Biggest Fraud in History
All things considered, the COVID vaccination campaign is the biggest medical fraud in
modern history. As Kirsch says, it’s a house of cards, held together by belief in data that
aren’t there and avoidance of confronting the safety signals in the VAERS system and
other studies that don’t comport with the narrative.
They even avoided the determination of one of the world’s top pathologists (Peter
Schirmacher) that at least 30% to 40% of the deaths two weeks post-vaccine were
caused by the vaccine. The still claim there are no deaths that have been attributed to
the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. That’s ridiculous.
“I've never seen anything like this, and I've never heard of anything like this
because the conspirators who are telling this false narrative are all the threeletter agencies under the Department of Health and Human Services — the FDA,
CDC and NIH.
They're all in on it, Congress is all in on it, mainstream media's all in on it, and
the medical community is all in on it. They can’t afford to back down now
because they are in it too deep. It would be too embarrassing to them.
We have been saying for months, ‘You guys have to look at the VAERS data,’ and
they have been ignoring and censoring us rather than engaging us with dialogue
— and none of these people will engage us in dialogue.
We tell the so-called ‘fact checkers’ where to look and what questions to ask the
CDC to verify our stories and they never follow up. The ‘fact checkers’ all refuse
to get on a recorded phone or Zoom call since they don’t want to be exposed as
One strategy for changing this is that we're going to run a series of ads. Each of
the ads will feature a unique personality, like a Dr. Peter McCullough, a sports
figure, doctors, victims and so on. They'll relate their personal anecdotes for
what's happened to them. And they will say, ‘Look, before you get vaccinated,
check the facts. Listen to the other side of the story.’
It's a reasonable ask. And we’ll direct them where to go to hear the side of the
story that the mainstream media aren’t allowing them to hear. And then we let
them make up their own mind. People aren't hearing the other side of the story,
and the White House is helping suppress it. When the White House has a hit list
of censorship, it's very clear what is going on. When in history have we done
Do you ever see McCullough on CNN? No, because they want to give you only
one side and they're deliberately giving you only one side of it, and they know it.
If they want to give the impression they are balanced, they’ll pick someone who
isn’t an expert and interview them. Robert Malone is never going to be on CNN.
Malone invented the mRNA vaccine and yet he doesn’t qualify to talk about it on
America used to be a country that embraced a diversity of views, and you had
freedom of speech, you had freedom to express your opinion. You had the
freedom to tell the truth. No more. That freedom has been taken away.
If you don't agree with the mainstream narrative, you're silenced. And so, what
we're going to do is run the series of ads, and we'll only be able to run it on
alternate media because the mainstream media won't run our ads because the
ads encourage people to hear the other side of the issue.”
Again, you can download Kirsch’s 177-page PDF, jam-packed with questions and data
on the COVID “vaccine.” I also urge you to review his “False Narrative Takedown” (TFNT)
series, which you can find on his Rumble channel.
You can also peruse his website, skirsch.io, or follow him on his social media accounts,
which include Twitter, Gab, Telegram and LinkedIn. To keep on top of his latest
investigations, you can subscribe to his Substack channel. If you can afford it, consider
signing up for a paid subscription. Select articles can also be found on TrialSiteNews.
“Substack is really important because they don’t censor people who tell the
truth,” Kirsch says. “So, I really encourage people to support platforms like
Substack. I also get a portion of that, and any money I get, I will donate 100% to
funding ads and to fighting this. If we can get 100,000 subscribers at $5 a
month, that's $500,000 a month we can spend to combat false narrative. That's
serious fire power.
People ask me, why am I doing this? I'm not making any money off of this. I
have no conflicts of interest. I have no history as a conspiracy theorist or
spreader of misinformation. We’ve lost all our friends. I was forced out of my
job because I wanted to speak out against the vaccines.
I'm losing money on this because I'm funding a lot of the things out of my
personal pocketbook. The donors that donated to the early treatment fund,
none of them, not a single one, is supporting the effort to get the truth out
about how dangerous these vaccines are and how wrong the mandates are.
My motivation is a 100% on saving lives. That's my reward in life. If I can save
one life, my life was worth living. If I can save 100 lives, even better. If I can
save 100,000 lives, that is more meaningful than anything I’ve ever done or will
Sources and References
The Expose September 18, 2021
Questions about the COVID vaccine (PDF)
Toxicology Reports September 2021; 8: 1665-1684
Journal of Data and Information Science Vol 1, No. 4. 2016
CDC MMWR October 29, 2021; 70(43): 1520-1524
Toxicologist Warns Against COVID Jabs
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked
Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D., a molecular biologist and toxicologist, has called for an
immediate halt to COVID-19 mRNA and DNA vaccines due to multiple safety concerns
There’s credible concern that the COVID jabs will cross-react with syncytin (a retroviral
envelope protein) and reproductive genes in sperm, ova and placenta in ways that may
impair fertility and reproductive outcomes
In the case of the COVID shots, important animal studies that help ascertain toxic and
systemic effects were not done. We’re now seeing danger signals that are not being
heeded. Preliminary safety results of mRNA COVID shots used in pregnant women,
published in April 2021, revealed an 82% miscarriage rate when the jab was administered
during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy
CDC data reveal more than 300 children between the ages of 12 and 18 have died from
myocarditis, a now-recognized side effect of the COVID jab, yet the shot is now
authorized for children as young as 5
Since the COVID gene therapies do not prevent infection, but only lessen symptoms, they
are actually a treatment, not a prevention. And there are far safer and more effective
treatment available, including nebulized peroxide, ozone therapy, and hydroxychloroquine
and ivermectin regimens
she delivered a three-minute public comment to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
Her expertise is analysis of pharmacological dose-responses, mechanistic biology and
complex toxicity dynamics. In her ACIP comment (see video below), Lindsay described
how she aided the development of a contraceptive vaccine in the 1990s that ended up
causing unintended autoimmune destruction and sterility in animals which, despite
careful pre-analysis, had not been predicted. She explains:
“We were developing what was meant to be a temporary contraceptive vaccine,
which was very attractive because it prevented fertilization rather than
preventing implantation — or it should have; that was the idea.
Unfortunately, even though quite a bit of analysis was done in different animal
models to make sure that it did not have an autoimmune action, it did end up
having an autoimmune action and caused complete ovarian destruction.
Now it's used in that manner [for permanent sterilization] in dogs, cats and
other animals. So, that's a cautionary tale of how animal studies can help us
avoid mistakes in humans when they're used properly, and when proper animal
studies are done.”
We May Be Sterilizing an Entire Generation
At the time, she called for an immediate halt to COVID-19 mRNA and DNA vaccines due
to safety concerns on multiple fronts. In particular, she noted there is credible concern
that they will cross-react with syncytin (a retroviral envelope protein) and reproductive
genes in sperm, ova and placenta in ways that may “impair fertility and reproductive
Not a single study has disproven this hypothesis, she noted. Another theory of how
these injections might impair fertility can be found in a 2006 study, which showed
sperm can take up foreign mRNA, convert it into DNA, and release it as little pellets
(plasmids) in the medium around the fertilized egg.
The embryo then takes up these plasmids and carries them (sustains and clones them
into many of the daughter cells) throughout its life, even passing them on to future
generations. It’s possible that the pseudo-exosomes that are the mRNA contents would
be perfect for supplying the sperm with mRNA for the spike protein.
So, potentially, a vaccinated woman who gets pregnant with an embryo that can (via the
sperms' plasmids) synthesize the spike protein according to the instructions in the
vaccine, would have an immune capacity to attack that embryo because of the "foreign"
protein it displays on its cells. This then would cause a miscarriage.
“We could potentially be sterilizing an entire generation,” Lindsey warned. The fact that
there have been live births following COVID-19 vaccination is not proof that these
injections do not have a reproductive effect, she said.
Lindsay also pointed out that reports of menstrual irregularities and vaginal
hemorrhaging in women who have received the injections number in the thousands,
and this too hints at reproductive effects. In this interview, we dive deeper into these
Something Has Gone Horribly Wrong
When asked how she ended up getting so passionately involved in this controversial
topic, Lindsay replies:
“I became interested in the issue because science was not making sense
anymore. For instance, herd immunity was being redefined. Herd immunity has
always been defined by a combination of the natural infection with vaccination
practices that work.
Suddenly, herd immunity was changed to only being attained through
vaccination, and I knew that that was horribly wrong, yet it was being touted
everywhere. It was certainly being touted by [Dr. Anthony] Fauci and others who
Other things were also happening within the scientific world. Two of our top tier
journals, The New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet, published
fraudulent hydroxychloroquine studies.
Ostensibly they had gone through peer review, and it should've been easy to
catch the errors in these studies — as well as many other studies that allow for
the emergency use authorization of these gene therapies — and they weren't
Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are very safe. They've been used safely in
pregnant women and children for decades, and suddenly they were being
vilified as if they were not safe. As a toxicologist, I know they are safe.
So, these types of things really piqued my attention along with all of the stuff
going on in the background with respect to the New World Order and the agenda
set by the World Economic Forum, and our joining into this, along with so many
other countries, despite their intent, their materials, which claim life will be
changed as we know it.
We will ‘own nothing and be happy [about it]’ in just a few years. All of these
things converged for me into a sense that something had gone horribly wrong,
that our regulatory institutes were captured, and that our scientific journals
were not being honest anymore …
There's a paper that came out in 2006 called ‘Disease Mitigation Measures in
the Control of Pandemic Influenza.’ This paper is wonderful. It goes through
World Health Organization and CDC guidelines on how to react during a
pandemic, what works and what doesn't work, and it clearly points out that
masks don't work.
They knew at that point they don't work. Travel lockdowns don't work. It's a
wonderful paper to basically go through everything we have done in response to
this pandemic, and say that's an inappropriate way to respond, and we have
scientific data that proves it. So, I encourage everybody to go back to that paper
… to really see how crazy we've gotten in the mandates that make no scientific
sense at all.”
Massive Danger Signal Is Being Ignored
As noted by Lindsay, in the case of the COVID shots, important animal studies that help
ascertain toxic and systemic effects were not done. But we’re still seeing danger signals
that need to be heeded.
Preliminary safety results of mRNA COVID shots used in pregnant women, based on
data from the V-Safe Registry, were published in The New England Journal of Medicine
(NEJM) in April 2021.
According to this paper, the miscarriage rate within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy was
12.5%, which is only slightly above the normal average of 10%. (Looking at statistical
data, the risk of miscarriage drops from an overall, average risk rate of 21.3% for the
duration of the pregnancy as a whole, to just 5% between Weeks 6 and 7, all the way
down to 1% between Weeks 14 and 20. )
However, there’s a distinct problem with this calculation, as highlighted by Drs. Ira
Bernstein and Sanja Jovanovic, and Deann McLeod, HBSc, of Toronto. In a May 28, 2021,
letter to the editor, they pointed out that:
“In table 4, the authors report a rate of spontaneous abortions <20 weeks (SA)
of 12.5% (104 abortions/827 completed pregnancies). However, this rate should
be based on the number of women who were at risk of an SA due to vaccine
receipt and should exclude the 700 women who were vaccinated in their thirdtrimester (104/127 = 82%).”
In other words, when you exclude women who got the shot in their third trimester (since
the third trimester is AFTER week 20 and therefore should not be counted when
determining miscarriage rate among those injected BEFORE week 20), the miscarriage
rate is a whopping 82%.
Of those 104 miscarriages, 96 of them occurred before 13 weeks of gestation, which
strongly suggests that getting a COVID shot during the first trimester is an absolute
recipe for disaster.
“They concluded, very fraudulently, in my estimation, that it was safe to
vaccinate in the third trimester, and said nothing about the clear safety signal in
the first trimester,” Lindsay says. “It’s just so dishonest, so purposefully
As for the women who get the shot in their third trimester, there’s still no telling what the
ramifications might be in the long term.
“We just don't know, and that's the problem,” Lindsay says. “There are all kinds
of things that can go wrong with these types of therapies, and have gone wrong
in animal models. We don't know what will happen in the future for these
women or for their children. This could be passed on.
We're seeing now a lot of mention of constitutive expression, whether that's
failure of the mRNA to degrade or integration into the genome. That's still being
Children Are Dying From COVID Jab-Induced Myocarditis
Lindsay goes on to cite a CDC report that shows more than 300 children between the
ages of 12 and 18 have died from myocarditis, a now-recognized side effect of the
We also know, based in part on whistleblower testimony, that more than 50,000
Americans have died within three days of these shots, and that’s just from one
database (the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System or VAERS). There are 10 other
databases that feed into the CDC that the public does not have access to.
“This many deaths, it's appalling and alarming,” Lindsay says. “Dr. Peter
McCullough says the safety signal for typical vaccines, other than this gene
therapy, would've been around 186 total. We’re now up to [17,128 reported
deaths in VAERS, as of October 15, 2021 ], but they haven't paused this in
They have not paused this while they're investigating the myocarditis. Instead,
they're pushing it even more. Has this ever happened before? I mean, does this
happen in a scenario where the population is at essentially zero risk for the
The cardiac deaths alone in perfectly healthy kids, and pulmonary embolism
deaths in kids, should've stopped this. They are at no risk [from COVID-19].
There is no reason to vaccinate them, absolutely zero reason to give them these
gene therapies because they're at no risk [from the infection] …
You know [the shot] is causing heart failure, pulmonary emboli, cardiac arrest in
healthy teenagers, and you're not pausing to investigate the risk versus reward
scenario? Something is horribly wrong.
Unfortunately, our regulatory institutions are not going to stop this. They've
clearly been captured. It's something that we're going to have to do. Vaccinated
and non-vaccinated must stand together to say, ‘No, you're not going to
experiment on my children’ …
With the RSV vaccines and the dengue fever vaccines, we had deaths in
children that were much fewer in number that stopped those campaigns as
well. It's very, very clear — if you don't get anything else out of this interview
with me, understand that our regulatory and safety agencies have been
They're not doing their job to protect you or your children. You must not trust
them, because they are not doing anything according to practices that used to
be adhered to. It's clear that they've been captured and compromised, and I hate
to say that. I really hate to say that, but that's the only logical answer ...
We have all these breakthrough cases too. If you look at Michigan, and I've
actually been privy to some other databases of true death numbers in different
states [comparing] those who are vaccinated and those who don't, and I can tell
you that the media is lying with respect to the unvaccinated making up 99% of
hospitalizations. They're absolutely lying.”
How the Jab Can Sabotage Fertility
Getting back to the fertility issue, Lindsay cites a Singaporean study that examined the
COVID jab’s ability to interfere with fertility by triggering anti-syncytin-1. The study
included 15 women, two of whom were pregnant. She explains:
“They did something that I had asked to be done a long time ago, which was to
measure anti-syncytin antibodies in an ELISA test. The syncytins are
conformationally and genetically similar to the [SARS-CoV-2] spike protein, this
fusogenic spike protein.
The thought by several experts was that you could have an autoimmune
reaction to the syncytins by developing an immune reaction to the spike protein,
and then that would prevent successful pregnancy.
But the syncytins are also important in a number of psychological diseases,
such as bipolar depression. They're important on autoimmune disease, lupus
and multiple sclerosis. They are present in skeletal muscle. There's some
association with breast cancer. They’re really important ancient retroviral
What this study found was extremely interesting. It found that every single one
of these women who had been vaccinated developed autoantibodies to
syncytin-1. Now, the authors kind of dismissed this and said, ‘Oh, but we don't
think that those antibodies were high enough to mean anything.’
But there was a clear difference between the pre-gene therapy sera [blood
sample] and the post-therapy sera … What it shows is that there is an antibody
response, and the significance of it, we don't really know. But every single one
of the women developed an antibody response that was different from the
baseline ... and I think that's probably what's causing some of these pregnancy
Are COVID Jabs a Population-Wide Immunocontraceptive?
When asked what she thinks the motive behind this mass injection campaign might be,
considering the clear danger signals, she replies:
“I certainly think that to discount that it is a form of population-wide
contraceptive would be naïve. There's a paper that came out in 2005. It's called
‘Evaluation of Fusogenic Trophoblast Surface Epitopes as Targets for Immune
This paper tried to find contraceptive peptides in persons that had infertility
problems already that were isolated to placentation. So, it was taking a
backwards approach, getting the sera from people who had fertility problems
and trying to see what they had antibodies to that was causing the fertility
This work was sponsored by the WHO and the Rockefeller Foundation [and the
National Institutes of Health]. No surprise there. It was then picked up by a
company called AplaGen that took it to patent in 2007.
These are 12-mer peptides, and there's a series of eight of them that can be
used to induce sterility. When they patented it, they also said that it could be
used to ameliorate sterility. Interestingly, it was also associated with all of the
things that we know syncytin is associated with, — lupus, skeletal muscle
disorders, bipolar depression [and] a number of other things.
Even though they don't name syncytin proteins as the proteins that are targeted,
they worked backwards from these peptides, and then said they were a series
of other proteins. Sometimes we know that proteins can be called the same
thing in different discovery realms. So, that's going to take more research, but it
was certainly interesting to me.
What it really points out is that there were efforts to use peptides or
immunocontraceptive means at the placental trophoblast interface to cause
sterilization … So, it would be naïve to think that this was not on the plate for
How Long Will Effects Last?
An obvious question is, how long might these effects last? Are they lifelong? Of course,
any answer we come up with here will be hypothetical only, as the studies simply haven’t
been done. That said, with her background in molecular biology, Lindsay is at least
qualified to theorize.
The mRNA is extremely fragile, which is why a nanolipid with polyethylene glycol
delivery system is used. In addition, about 30% of the mRNA has been genetically
modified to decrease degradation. As a result, the mRNA being injected is magnitudes
sturdier than natural mRNA.
What’s more, the nanoliposomes allow for superior penetration into tissues, and we now
know it spreads throughout your body. It doesn’t stay in your deltoid. How long this
modified and stabilized mRNA remains viable is still unknown, however. A corollary
question is whether this mRNA might be integrated into your genome to become a
“The answer is, we don't know for sure,” Lindsay says. “Of course, with the
adenoviral vector vaccines [Janssen and AstraZeneca], they're more prone to
integration into the genome. We know that from animal studies and past
With the mRNA technology, we've never stabilized something like this in this
manner. What we do know is that recent studies have come out — Bruce
Patterson's group and another group — both came out with the finding that the
spike protein is being expressed, [it’s] present on monocytes, as far out as from
the time that the people were given the gene therapy.
So, that gives us an indication that it is resistant, for sure, to degradation. The
longer it stays around, and is resistant to degradation, the more likely that
genomic integration events can occur. But I don't know the answer to whether or
not it will become a permanent feature.”
Make a Rational Choice
As explained by Lindsay, no coronavirus vaccine has ever been successfully brought to
market, despite 20 years of effort. All have failed due to antibody dependent
enhancement, where the vaccination facilitates infection rather than protects against it.
If all these gene therapies do is lessen the diseases,
then they're not a vaccine, they are a treatment. You
have to use your common sense to say, why wouldn't I
use a treatment that has been known to be safe over 70
years as opposed to one that is brand-new, that is
experimental? ~ Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D.”
Now, we’re to believe a safe and effective coronavirus “vaccine” has been developed in
mere months. She also makes another important point. Since the COVID gene therapies
do not prevent infection, but only lessen symptoms, they are actually a treatment, not a
And there are far safer and more effective treatments available, including nebulized
peroxide, ozone therapy, and hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin regimens.
“If all these gene therapies do is lessen the diseases, then they're not a vaccine,
they are a treatment,” she says. “They are a treatment that you don't know the
mid- or long-term consequences of, that have already caused a number of
adverse events. You have to use your common sense to say, why wouldn't I use
a treatment that has been known to be safe over 70 years as opposed to one
that is brand-new, that is experimental?”
Other Safety Signals
Aside from fertility issues, heart inflammation and blood clots, another side effect seen
among the fully “vaccinated” is de novo Type 1 diabetes in adults. This makes sense
considering Pfizer’s biodistribution study showed the spike protein accumulates in the
pancreas. The natural SARS-CoV infection can also have this effect.
Type 1 diabetes is a serious problem, as it leaves you metabolically handicapped for the
rest of your life, dependent on extremely costly insulin injections. Doctors are also
reporting an increase in pancreatic cancer and acute myeloid leukemia.
Where Do We Go From Here?
“Many scientists and physicians feel as I do, and are trying to figure out where we go
from here,” Lindsay says, “because our typical safety and regulatory agencies have been
compromised.” She believes we need to continue sharing the data and facts that
mainstream media refuse to discuss, and continue urging those who have received the
jab to at least protect their children.
“We need to stand together as one people and say we're not going to accept
this, especially not for our children, and try to get to the bottom of this and see
what's really behind all these efforts. Is it really about a virus, or is it more about
other political motivations and campaigns, as it seems to be?”
I’m less optimistic about the idea of breaking through the brainwashing to get people to
not sacrifice their children. So many have their minds set in cement with the wrong
information. They could have their brother, sister, mother or father get the shot and die
with the needle still on their arm, and they’d still go out to get a booster the next day.
I've seen it so many times. My friends, their parents, their siblings and loved ones —
there's this barrier that prevents any openness to new information. They've made their
decision. Mark Twain said, "It's far easier to fool someone than to convince them they've
been fooled." And it's true.
So, while I agree that we must keep trying, and have faith that truth will prevail, I also
think it’s important to have realistic expectations. We’re up against the most effective
propaganda campaign in modern history. It’s psychological warfare at its best.
From my perspective, being a pragmatic realist, I believe the best strategy is to reinforce
and support those who didn’t buy into the propaganda narrative to begin with, because
they don’t struggle with that cognitive dissonance. If we stick together and support each
other, so none of us get sucked into the lunacy, then we can at least preserve the control
Ultimately, the truth will come out, as long as we can preserve the control group. In a
year or two, or three, we will clearly be able to tell how devastating this intervention was
simply by comparing the two groups. I suspect those who got the shot will be severely
crippled in various ways, and those who didn’t get the shot will have far better health in
“I absolutely agree that we have to preserve a control group. We also have to
think of ways that we can help those that have been injured. I brought this out in
a letter I recently wrote, advocating for Dr. McCullough.
People who have gotten this inoculation, if they have mid- to long-term effects,
if you deny that any adverse effects are really going on, then the efforts going
into those treatments for people who are having side effects are not going to be
there. We have to accept that these [side effects] are real in order to help people
who have already taken the inoculations, and I believe we have to try.”
Sources and References
Molecular Reproduction and Development 73(10):1239-46
MSN April 10, 2021
UK Gov Yellow Card Report Unspecified Brand March 28, 2021 (PDF)
Life Site News April 19, 2021
Biosecurity Bioterror 2006; 4(4): 366-375
NEJM 2021; 384: 2273-2282
Medical News Today January 12, 2020
Wayback NEJM Letter to the Editor June 27, 2021
US District Court of Alabama Civil Action No. 2:21-cv-00702-CLM (PDF)
The Defender July 20, 2021
OpenVAERS Data as of October 15, 2021
Contraception April 2005; 71(4): 282-293
A place to talk about whatever you want
Terms Of Service
Terms Of Service
Notmyarm.com is completely funded by you. We depend on your donations to fund our open source technology on independent servers. This ensures a platform free from censorship and "corporate" or government control. Please help us by making a donation via Paypal or Credit Card: